Correcting Your IRA’s RMD Failures and Avoiding the Penalty

by | Jan 5, 2016 | News

If you failed to take required minimum distributions (RMD’s) from your IRA, then you are subject to a 50% penalty. The penalty is 50% on the amount you should have distributed from your IRA to yourself. It’s a steep penalty for simply failing to pay yourself from your own IRA and it’s something every IRA owner with RMD needs to understand. For my prior article explaining RMD rules for IRAs, please click here.

Waiver of 50% Penalty Tax

If you’ve failed to take RMD for your IRA, you have a chance at obtaining a waiver from the penalty but you must admit the mistake to the IRS by filing IRS form 5329. In the instructions to form 5329, the IRS outlines the waiver process to avoid the 50% penalty tax.

What You Need to Do

  1. Complete Section IX of Form 5329. You need to specify what you should have taken as RMD  and then you calculate the penalty tax due. You then write the letters “RC”next to the amount you want waived on line 52.
  2. Statement of Explanation. Attach a Statement of Explanation outlining two items.
    1. First, explain what was the “reasonable error” that caused a failure to take RMD. The IRS does not provide a definition or acceptable examples of “reasonable error”. See IRC 4974(d)(1). From my own experience and from examples I’ve heard from colleagues, the IRS does recognize reasonable errors and oversights in most situations where there is reason for the error. This would include situations such mental health, to turning 70 ½ and being new to RMD, to relying on bad advice from an advisor, custodian or accountant, to holding an ill-liquid asset for sale in a self directed IRA.
    2. Second, explain the reasonable steps taken to correct the error. Ideally, by the time you’re filing the exemption request you would’ve already contacted your IRA custodian and would’ve taken the late RMD so that by the time you submit the RMD penalty tax waiver, you would be caught up and would have already remedied the error.  This makes for an easy and clean explanation of what steps you’re going to take as your explanation will be that you already corrected the RMD failure once you realized the error.

Keep in mind that RMD failures won’t go away as your IRA custodian will be updating your account each year with the IRS. Eventually, you’ll start getting collection letters from the IRS requesting the penalty tax. Consequently, IRA owners are well advised to correct the RMD failure and request the wavier as soon as they become aware of the error or oversight.

Who are Self Directed IRA Investors? An Essay

by | Oct 6, 2015 | News

I was recently interviewed and asked, “what has caused so many investors to self-direct their retirement plan?” As many people know, self-directed retirement plan investors use their self-directed IRA and 401(k)s to invest into real estate, private companies, precious metals and other “non-wall street” investments. I’ve worked with thousands of self-directed IRA and 401(k) investors and as I reflected on the question, I realized that there are three primary categories of self-directed investors.

I. COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE INVESTORS USING ROTH ACCOUNTS

These investors like to invest in what they know. They avoid mutual funds and the stock market because they have a competitive advantage over other investors and usually have a special expertise over other investors. Because they have a special expertise, they often expect to make significant returns and therefore will frequently use Roth IRA or 401(k) accounts for their investments. Let me offer a few examples from actual un-named clients of mine that all resulted in 7 figure returns.

  • Software Engineer. Software Engineer who used Roth IRA funds along with some other technology savvy investors and funded an LLC. This LLC then engaged and paid some un-related developers to develop new programming that the Roth IRA investors knew would have value. The LLC owned by the Roth IRAs then in turn negotiated a royalty agreement with an unrelated company who wanted the technology to be used in a specific software program that it would sell commercially. The LLC receives royalties on the use/sales of the product. The income goes back to the Roth IRAs tax free.
  • Real Estate Developer. Real estate developers and investors personally develop millions of dollars of real estate a year and decides to use his Roth IRA to fund a specific real estate investment. Real estate developer converted a couple hundred thousand dollars of traditional IRA funds to Roth IRA funds so that he could acquire a specific piece of real estate that was to be held and later sold. The developer knows the land would have significant value over the next few years as a result of zoning law changes and planned development from neighboring property. The Roth IRA paid for some paper development zoning changes upon acquisition and then held the property as an investment for a few years. The property later increased nearly 10 times in value as neighboring development took off.
  • Bio-Tech Start-Up Entrepreneur. An experienced bio-tech investor had an opportunity to invest at early stages in a patent that was going to be the basis for a new bio-tech start-up. The investor used Roth IRA funds and funded additional research costs in exchange for an interest in the patent that was being developed by un-related researchers for commercial purposes. The patent was the basis of value for a start-up venture and the Roth IRA received a significant share of the company in exchange for the patent interest.

This group would also include former Republican Party Nominee, Mitt Romney, and famous Venture Capitalist, Peter Theil, whose large self-directed IRAs have been reported on extensively.

Keep in mind, the rules for these investments are complex and careful planning must be taken to avoid prohibited transactions, as well as unrelated business income tax (UBIT). However, when properly executed with the right investment, this group can sock away significant returns in tax-free Roth accounts. There’s no better deal in the tax code than this!

II. SEEKING INCREASED RETURNS AND TIRED OF POOR FUND OR STOCK PERFORMANCE

This is the largest group of self directed IRA investors. These investors have seen stagnant performance, losses, or ridiculous fees eat away at their retirement account.  They are generally tired of the ups and downs of the stock market and want stable investments they can actually understand. This group usually invests in real estate, in its various forms, because it can offer more stable returns and because the investor can actually understand the investment (something they can’t do from a 100 page mutual fund prospectus). Here are a couple of actual client examples.

  • Retired Corporate Manager Becomes a Real Estate Investor. A retired real estate investor client of mine rolled over former employer 401(k) funds to a traditional self-directed IRA. This investor is in their early 60’s and uses the income from her retirement account to live on. She invested her traditional IRA into a modest 3 bd 2 bth single family rental. The property has no debt and the cash-flow goes back into her IRA. She routinely takes distributions of the cash-flow to supplement her retirement income. Since this is a traditional IRA she is taxed on the distributions (as she would with any traditional IRA) but she is not reducing the actual investment value of the IRA as she only distributes the cash-flow. This client has had an increase in confidence as the rental income has proven to be consistent over time and she still knows that her IRA owns the property so she doesn’t feel like she’s depleting her retirement account when she takes distributions of the cash-flow. Frankly, I’ve talked to hundreds if not thousands of clients in a scenario similar to this.
  • Real Estate Broker Loans Solo 401(k) Funds to Other Investors. This real estate broker uses his self-directed 401(k) to loan money to real estate investors buying investment properties. Some people refer to use these loans as hard money loans or as trust deed loans. The 401(k) will loan funds to other real estate investors in situations where banks are typically un-willing to lend. The real estate broker lends to properties in markets that he knows and receives a first or second place deed of trust (mortgage) securing his loan. The typical loan terms are 10% annual interest with 2 points. This self-directed investor knows real estate and has been able to receive annual returns far in excess of the stock market.

III. HARD ASSETS OVER PAPER ASSETS

These investors value hard assets over paper assets. They are generally disillusioned by the stock market and feel that price to earnings ratios of publically traded companies have sky-rocketed without regard to company performance. They tend to believe that stock prices have nothing to do with actual value but instead are propped up by the Wall Street money machine. They’ve usually had retirement accounts for years and have seen their account go through the dot-com bubble and the financial crisis. They have little faith in paper assets and desire to move to a self-directed account at a time when they believe the market is going to collapse. Most of these investors will invest in precious metals or real estate.

  • Retired Corporate 401(k). A retired corporate employee rolls over a portion of his prior employer’s 401(k) to a self-directed IRA and buys actual precious metals that are stored at a depository for his IRA. The precious metals are not an ETF or a fund but are actual, physical, gold bullion that meets the retirement plan rules for ownership by an IRA. Common precious metals would be gold or silver bullion as well as specifically approved American Eagle coins.
  • Working Corporate Employee with Prior Employer 401(k). A 50 year old corporate employee uses her present employer retirement plan for standard mutual fund investments based on risk factors and tolerances for investors her age. Her current employer’s plan cannot be self-directed but she rolls over a prior employer’s 401(k) to a self-directed IRA and uses that self-directed IRA to invest in real estate investments with other like-minded investors. The investors use their self directed IRAs and each invest into the newly created IRA/LLC (and LLC owned by IRAs). The LLC then uses the combined funds to purchase a multi-family property. In the end, her IRA owns a 20% interest in an LLC that owns an apartment building.

There are many other characteristics of self-directed investors and even more examples of these groups in the industry. However, the three groups above seem to capture 90% of the growing self-directed retirement plan market. Additionally, many investors have cross over and identify in two or all three of these groups. Because self-directed IRAs and 401(k)s give investors options for greater control and because they provide better access to investment opportunities, we will only continue to see growth in the self-directed retirement plan market.

By: Mat Sorensen, Attorney and best-selling Author of The Self Directed IRA Handbook

Mat has been at the forefront of the self-directed IRA industry since 2006. He is the CEO of Directed IRA & Directed Trust Company where they handle all types of self-directed accounts (IRAs, Roth IRAs, HSAs, Coverdell ESA, Solo Ks, and Custodial Accounts) which are typically invested into real estate, private company/private equity, IRA/LLCs, notes, precious metals, and cryptocurrency. Mat is also a partner at KKOS Lawyers and serves clients nationwide from its Phoenix, AZ office.

He is published regularly on retirement, tax, and business topics, as well as a VIP Contributor at Entrepreneur.com. Mat is the best-selling author of the most widely used book in the self-directed IRA industry, The Self-Directed IRA Handbook: An Authoritative Guide for Self-Directed Retirement Plan Investors and Their Advisors.

California Rollover IRAs Can Receive ERISA-Style Creditor Protection

by | Sep 15, 2015 | News

Have you rolled over your 401(K) plan or other employer based plan to a rollover IRA? Has someone told you that your rollover IRA in California isn’t protected from creditors. They’re wrong.

California Exemptions

Retirement plans are known for being great places to build wealth and they have numerous tax and legal advantages. One of the key benefits of building wealth in a retirement account is that those funds are generally exempt from creditors. However, some states have laws that protect employer based retirement plans (aka, ERISA Plans) more extensively than IRAs. California is one of those states as their laws treat IRAs and ERISA based plans differently (the California Code refers to ERISA based plans, such 401(k)s, as private retirement plans) .

California Code of Civ. Proc., § 704.115, subds. (b),(d), treats funds held in a private retirement plan as fully exempt from collection by creditors. “Private retirement plans” include in their definition “profit-sharing” plans. The most common type of profit sharing plan is commonly known as a 401(k) plan.

IRAs, on the other hand, are only exempt from creditors up to an amount “necessary to provide for the support of the … [IRA owner, their spouse and dependents] … taking into account all resources that are likely to be available…” In other words, the exemption protection for IRAs is “limited”. California Code of Civ. Proc., § 704.115, subdivision (e).

McMullen v. Haycock

Notwithstanding the limited creditor protections for IRAs outlined above, the California Court of Appeals has ruled that rollover IRAs funded from “private retirement plans” receive full creditor protection as if they were a fully protected private retirement plan under California law. McMullen v. Haycock, 54 Cal.Rptr.3d 660 (2007). In McMullen v. Haycock, McMullen had a judgement against Haycock for over $500,000.  McMullen attempted to get a writ of execution against Haycock’s IRA at Charles Schwab. In defending against the writ of execution, Haycock claimed that the entire IRA was a rollover IRA funded and traceable to a private retirement plan and thus fully protected from collection as a private retirement plan. Haycock relied on California Code of Civ. Proc., § 703.80, which allows for the tracing of funds for purposes of applying exemptions.

Haycock lost at the trial court level but appealed and the appellate court found in his favor and ruled that his rollover IRA was fully protected from the collection of creditors as the funds in the rollover IRA were traceable to a fully exempt private retirement plan (e.g. former employer’s 401(k) plan).

As a result of McMullen v. Haycock, California IRA owners whose IRAs consist entirely of funds rolled over from a private retirement plan of an employer are fully protected from the collection efforts of creditors. IRAs that consist of individual contributions and are not funded from a prior employer plan rollover will only receive limited creditor protection. It is unclear so far how an IRA would be treated that consists of both private retirement plan rollover funds and new IRA contributions. Presumably, the Courts will trace the funds and separate out the private retirement plan rollover IRA portions from the regular IRA contributions and the regular IRA contributions would then receive the limited protection. Unfortunately, there is no case law or guidance yet as to rollover IRAs with mixed rollover and regular IRA contributions.

McMullen v. Haycock was a big win for IRA owners with funds rolled over from a private retirement plan and one that should be kept in mind when planning your financial and asset protection plan.

Avoiding State Income Tax on Retirement Plan Distributions

by | Jul 21, 2015 | News

When a retiree begins taking distributions from a traditional IRA, 401(k), or pension plan, those distributions are taxable to the retiree under federal income tax and any applicable state income tax rules. While federal taxation cannot be avoided, state taxation may be avoided depending on your state of residency. In general, there are some states that have zero income tax and therefore don’t tax retirement plan distributions, some states that have special exemptions for retirement plan distributions, and other states that do in fact tax retirement plan distributions. This article breaks down the basics and discusses some of the states where income taxes can be avoided.

The No State Income Tax States

First, the easiest way to avoid state income tax on retirement plan distributions is to establish residency in a state that has no state income tax. It isn’t just the fun and sun of Florida that helps attract all of those retirees. It’s the tax free state income treatment that you’ll get from all of that money stocked away in your retirement account. The other states with no income tax and therefore no tax on retirement plan distributions are Alaska, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming.

States with Retirement Income Exclusions

Second, there are some states that have a state income tax but who exempt retirement plan distributions for retirees from state income taxes. There are 36 states in this category that have some sort of exemption for retirement plan distributions. As each of these states are very different, so too are their exemptions. The type of retirement account, however, does tend to govern the exemptions available. Here’s a quick summary of the common exemptions found in the states.

  1. For Public Pensions and Retirement Plans. Distributions from federal or state employer plans are exempt from taxation in many states. This is the most common exemption amongst states that have an income tax but who exempt some types of retirement plan distributions from income. Most of the 36 states that have an exemption for retirement plan income provide an exemption for public employee pensions and retirement plans.
  2. For Private Pensions and Retirement Plans. About 10 states offer a full exclusion for private pensions and retirement plans. Some of them differ between pension and contributory plans (e.g. 401(k)) and some of them make no distinction. Pennsylvania, for example, excludes all income distributions. Hawaii excludes certain distributions from state income tax for private retirement plans and for portions from company plans rolled over to a rollover IRA and then distributed from the rollover IRA.
  3. For IRAs. There are some states that do no tax any retirement pan distributions, including IRA distributions to retirees. Illinois for example does not tax distributions from retirement plans at all (pensions, IRAs, 401(k) s). Tennessee and New Hampshire are states that do not tax wage income and therefore they do not tax retirement plan distributions of any kind (IRA, 401(k), etc.). There are also numerous states that exclude a certain limit of retirement plan income from taxation. For example, Main exempts the first $10,000 of income from any retirement plan, including IRAs.

In sum, the state tax rules for retirement plan distributions are complicated and vary significantly. Each state can be understood rather quickly though and everyone planning for retirement should understand how state income taxes may eat into their planned retirement plan distributions. I, for example, looked into Arizona and found that there is no exemption for 401(k) or IRA income in the state of Arizona. While we do have a low state income tax rate, Arizona state income tax includes income from private retirement plans (pensions and 401(k) s) and IRAs and has a modest deduction for distributions from public retirement plans. Each state is unique to the type of plan, and the amounts being distributed but don’t just think you need to be in a state with zero income tax to avoid taxes on retirement plan distributions. For example, you could be in Illinois, Tennessee, or New Hampshire and could realize state income tax-free distributions of your IRA or 401(k).  The National Conference of State Legislators has an updated 2015 chart that is very useful and can be used to look up your state’s tax treatment of retirement plan distributions for retirees.

2014 Tax Reporting for Your Self-Directed IRA

by | Jan 27, 2015 | UBIT & UDFI Tax

Self-Directed IRA investors should be aware of the following IRA tax reporting responsibilities.  Some of these items are completed by your custodian and some of them are the IRA owner’s sole responsibility. Here’s a quick summary of what should be reported to the IRS each year for your IRA.

IRA Custodian Files

Your IRA Custodian will file the following forms to the IRS annually:

IRS FORM PURPOSE WHAT DOES IT REPORT
Form 5498 Filed to the IRS by your custodian. No taxes are due or paid as a result of Form 5498. IRA contributions, roth conversions, the accounts fair market value as of 12/31/14, and required minimum distributions taken.
Form 1099-R Filed to the IRS by your custodian to report any distributions or Roth conversions. The amounts distributed or converted are generally subject to tax and are claimed on your personal tax return. IRA distributions for the year, Roth IRA conversions, and also rollovers that are not direct IRA trustee to IRA trustee.

IRA Owner’s Responsibility

Depending on your self-directed IRA investments, you may be required to file the following tax return(s) with the IRS for your IRA’s investments/income:

IRS FORM DOES MY IRA NEED TO FILE THIS? DUE DATE
1065 Partnership Tax Return If your IRA is an owner in an LLC, LP, or other partnership, then the Partnership should file a 1065 Tax Return for the company to the IRS and should issue a K-1 to your IRA for its share of income or loss. Make sure the account preparing the company return knows to use your custodian’s tax ID for your IRA’s K-1’s and not your personal SSN. If your IRA owns an LLC 100%, then it is disregarded (single member LLC) and the LLC does not need to file a tax return to the IRS. April 15th, 6 month extension available
990-T IRA Tax Return (UBIT) If your IRA incurs unrelated business income tax (UBIT), then it is required to file a tax return. The IRA files a tax return and any taxes due are paid from the IRA. Most self-directed IRAs don’t need to file a 990-T for their IRA, but you may be required to file for your IRA if your IRA obtained a non-recourse loan to buy a property (UDFI tax), or if your IRA participates in non-passive real estate investments such as construction, development, or on-going short-term flips. You may also have UBIT if your IRA has received income from an active trade or business (c-corp dividends exempt). Rental income (no debt leverage), interest income, capital gain income, and dividend income are exempt from UBIT tax. April 15th, 3 month extension available

 

Frequently Asked Questions

I’ve answered the most frequently asked questions below as they relate to your IRA’s tax reporting responsibilities.

Q: My IRA is a member of an LLC with other investors. What should I tell the accountant preparing the tax return about reporting profit/loss for my IRA?

A: Let your accountant know that the IRA should receive the K-1 (e.g. ABC Trust Company FBO John Doe IRA) and that they should use the Tax-ID of your custodian and not your personal SSN. Contact your custodian to obtain their Tax ID. Most custodians are familiar with this process so it should be readily available.

Q: Why do I need to provide an annual valuation to my custodian for the LLC (or other company) my IRA owns?

A: Your IRA custodian must report your IRA’s fair market value as of the end of the year (as of 12/31/14) to the IRS on Form 5498 and in order to do this they must have an accurate record of the value of your IRA’s investments. If your IRA owns an LLC, they need to know the value of that LLC. For example, let’s say you have an IRA that owns an LLC 100% and that this LLC owns a rental property and that it also has a bank account with some cash. If the value of the rental property at the end of the year was $150,000 and if the cash in the LLC bank account is $15,000, then the value of the LLC at the end of the year is $165,000.

Q: I have a property owned by my IRA and I obtained a non-recourse loan to purchase the property. Does my IRA need to file a 990-T tax return?

A: Probably. A 990-T tax return is required if your IRA has income subject to UBIT tax. There is a tax called UDFI tax (unrelated debt financed income) that is triggered when your IRA uses debt to acquire an asset. Essentially, what the IRS does in this situation is they make you apportion the percent of your investment that is the IRAs cash (tax favorable treatment) and the portion that is debt (subject to UDFI/UBIT tax) and your IRA end up paying taxes on the profits that are generated from the debt as this is non-retirement plan money. If you have rental income for the year, then you can use expenses to offset this income. However, if you have $1,000 or more of gross income subject to UBIT then you should file a 990-T tax return. In addition, if you have losses for the year you may want to file 990-T to claim those losses as they can carry-forward to be used to offset future gains (e.g. sale of the property).

Q: How do I file a 990-T tax return for my IRA?

A: This is filed by your IRA and is not part of your personal tax return. If tax is due, you will need to send the completed tax form to your IRA custodian along with an instruction to pay the tax due and your custodian will pay the taxes owed from the IRA to the IRS. Your IRA must obtain its own Tax ID to file Form 990-T. Your IRA custodian does not file this form or report UBIT tax to the IRS for your IRA. Our law firm is preparing and filing 990-T tax returns for our self-directed IRA and 401(k) clients. Contact us at the law firm if you need assistance.

Sadly, not many professionals are familiar with the rules and tax procedures for self-directed IRAs so it is important to seek out those attorneys, accountants, and CPAs who can help you understand your self-directed IRA tax reporting obligations. Our law firm routinely advises clients and their accountants on the rules and procedures that I have summarized in this article and we can also prepare and file your 990-T tax return.